Nokia 3 and Moto E4 - both these models have almost identical specs but there are few differences as well apart from the price. Let's have a look, how they are different and who is better between Moto E4 and Nokia 3.
Both Nokia 3 & Moto E4 has 5-Inch HD IPS display with 1280 x 720 resolution which produces 294 PPI resolution. However, Nokia 3 does have Gorilla Glass while Moto E4 does not have any specific glass protection.
Nokia 3 has 2,630 mAh battery while Moto E4 has 2,800 mAh battery. The good thing about Moto E4 is that it comes with removable battery and you also get 5W fast charger with the box. Moto E4 scores better if we compare the overall battery performance.
RAM & Internal Memory
Both phones have got 2GB RAM and 16GB Internal Memory (ROM), which you can expand up to another 128GB with the help of MicroSD card. Both phones support OTG.
Both Nokia 3 & Moto E4 has got 8MP rear camera. Moto E4 has got 5MP front camera with LED Flash while Nokia 3 has got 8MP front camera with LED Flash. But the biggest difference is video capturing. Moto E4 allows you to capture Full HD videos while you can shoot only up to 720p resolution videos with Nokia 3.
Other Important Features
Nokia 3 has got NFC connectivity while Moto E4 does not have NFC Connectivity. Moto E4 has fingerprint sensor while Nokia 3 does not have fingerprint sensor.
No. Nokia 3 does not have the inbuilt fast charging. The supplied charger is of 1A output. If you want fast charging for Nokia 3 - you can buy Fast Charger for Nokia 3.
Nokia 3 and Vivo Y53 are available almost at the same price. However, Nokia 3 is slightly better than Vivo Y53.
Both Nokia 3 and Vivo Y53 has a 5-Inch display. However, Vivo Y53 has got the lower resolution of 960 x 540 pixels while Nokia 3 has 1280 x 720 pixels. Nokia 3 does have 294 PPI resolution while Vivo Y53 has 220 PPI resolution. Besides, Nokia 3 also has Gorilla Glass protection but Vivo Y53 does not have the Gorilla Glass protection.
RAM & Internal Memory
Both Nokia 3 and Vivo Y53 has got 2GB RAM and 16GB Internal memory. Both phones do not have hybrid sim slot and offer the same level of memory options.
Nokia 3 and Vivo Y53 both has 8MP rear camera. But Nokia is slightly better in the case of the front camera. Nokia 3 does have an 8MP front camera while Vivo Y53 has a 5MP front camera. Besides, Nokia 3 front camera also has autofocus. However, you cannot record full HD videos with Nokia 3 rear camera while Vivo Y53 can capture full HD videos.
Both phones have a nonremovable battery. None of the phones has wireless charging or fast charging. Nokia 3 has 2630 mAh battery while Vivo Y53 has 2500 mAh battery.
Both phones have support for OTG. In addition, Nokia 3 also has NFC sensor.
In our opinion, the Nokia 3 is best suited for first-time smartphone buyers and those looking for some experience with Android in general.
It may look like one of the best cheap phones on the market but the Nokia 3 is style over substance, struggling with long load times and poor battery life.